【Anal sex movies】

Well,Anal sex movies there goes the tiniest privacy silver lining on that otherwise dark coronavirus cloud.

A new study from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found that many commercially available facial-recognition systems are still able to correctly identify people wearing face masks. As mask use becomes ever more commonplace due to the pandemic, there continues to be much law enforcement hand-wringing about possible negative effects on the pervasive surveillance technology. The NIST study suggests that police can rest easy.

The study, published Monday, evaluated the performance of 89 facial-recognition algorithms. Notably, these were all algorithms developed pre-pandemic. In other words, none of them were developed for a world where masked individuals are the norm. Even so, according to NIST, some of the algorithms performed remarkably well at identifying people with masks on.

"Using unmasked images, the most accurate algorithms fail to authenticate a person about 0.3% of the time," explains a press release accompanying the study. "Masked images raised even these top algorithms' failure rate to about 5%, while many otherwise competent algorithms failed between 20% to 50% of the time."

While that may actually sound pretty good — mask wearing increased the error rate, after all — the fact that it only increased it to about 5 percent for higher performing algorithms isn't exactly heartening.

Thankfully, there are some notable caveats to the study which may translate to a little less doom and gloom. For starters, the study authors — Mei Ngan, Patrick Grother, and Kayee Hanaoka — digitally added masks to photos in order to run the test. They admit that this creates a whole host of unknowns and new considerations.

For example, would the varying textures of real masks affect the algorithms in some unknown manner? Or, alternatively, how might the technology respond to the inconsistent fit of different masks on diverse faces?

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

These questions are difficult to answer without using real photos of people wearing actual masks.

Example of the type of digital masks applied to photos for the NIST study. Credit: nist

What's more, the study authors "did not address the effect of eye-glasses or eye-protection." In other words, glasses or sunglasses might provide the wearer with added protection against facial recognition.

Don't get too comfortable, however, as the caveats go the other way, too. For starters, remember, this study was done on pre-pandemic algorithms. NIST already has a study in the works to look at facial-recognition technology specifically designed for the face-mask era.

"With respect to accuracy with face masks," NIST computer scientist Mei Ngan cautioned in the press release, "we expect the technology to continue to improve."

Also, there's the possibility that — in some limited cases — masks might actually make it easier to identify subjects.

"We received a suggestion that such information [like patterned masks] may serve as a soft biometric," notes the study, "in that a subject that always wears the same textured mask will be more identifiable."

SEE ALSO: Police claim 'violent extremists' exploit coronavirus to defeat facial recognition

The research was conducted "in collaboration with" both the Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection — an important fact to keep in mind as demonstrations following the killing of George Floyd continue across the country, and body-armor sporting feds respond violently to protesters in Portland, Oregon.

So the next time you take to the streets to protest police brutality and federal overreach, remember: Your coronavirus mask alone isn't enough to guarantee your anonymity.

Topics Black Lives Matter Cybersecurity Facial Recognition Privacy COVID-19

• Digital Culture
• Science
• Games
• Life
• Social Good
• Shopping
• Tech
• Entertainment

• Turtle Beach Recon 50P gaming headset deal: 28% off
• Spreadsheet Assassins
• Tea Party Report
• Bookselling Out
• Put Me In, Coach!
• Venture Missionaries
• Teenage Dreams
• Week of Wonders
• Apple is reportedly still working on smart glasses of some kind
• Look Who’s Talking

• Adele will be back to perform at the Grammys
• Here's George W. Bush trying his best to figure out how ponchos work at the inauguration
• US Army tests autonomous 'hoverbike' prototype
• One of the most popular White House website pages is a petition seeking Trump's tax returns
• The Oakland Raiders filed for relocation, and it's probably not going to go well
• Chrissy Teigen's run in with a racist paparazzo shook the internet
• Unicorn ramen is real
• Newborn baby becomes ideal wingman in father's surprise proposal
• Inauguration crowds are looking puny compared to Women's March crowds
• Ancient moon volcanoes made tiny glass beads. Here's what they mean.

• Ryzen 5 1600X vs. 1600: Which should you buy?
• University of Hindutva
• Happy Ending
• The Measurers
• Eufy L60 robot vacuum: Get it for $279.95 at Amazon
• The Failure of Liberal Zionism
• Take Me Out to the Mallpark
• That Ain’t Cool
• Trump's new tariff plan spares some smartphones, laptops
• Fredric Jameson’s Never-ending Story

• NYT Connections hints and answers for May 18: Tips to solve 'Connections' #707.
• 45,000 Feet
• Running Amok
• Trauma Wards
• U.N. aims to make carbon emissions cost money at COP 25 climate talks
• The Collector
• The Poet Is Present
• Leaving, Again
• Best travel deal: Take 30% off Southwest flights
• Spreadsheet Assassins