【Sex Partner Who Is More Attracted to Married Women】

Do you have Sex Partner Who Is More Attracted to Married Womena minute? Are you sitting down? Good, because once again, the internet just provided the world with a real head-scratcher, and you're going to need to be comfortable for this one.

Twitter user bobby joined in on the great millennial tradition of throwing up a divisive question for the internet to fight over—and once again, it's about pants.

SEE ALSO: No one can agree on how a dog is supposed to wear human pants

"Quick question," bobby asked Twitter with an infographic speculating if pants wore pants, how exactly would they wear them.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

There are only two possible answers: Option A, which shows a pair of pants on each pant leg, or Option B, which shows a pair of pants pulled over the original pant-seeking trousers.

But which is the rightoption? That's up to you and your confused brain.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Some people used interesting logic to support option A:

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

While others argued that B was the only reasonable option:

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

And then there's the smarty who argued neither options were correct:

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Either way, mind blown.

Via Giphy

---

Featured Video For You

---

Surprise! Turns out blue eyes aren't really blue

---

• Science
• Deals
• Entertainment
• Games
• Shopping
• Tech
• Life
• Social Good

• Today's Hurdle hints and answers for April 29, 2025
• What Does It Mean to Be Smart? Five Koans on Intelligence
• ¡Figaro! 90210, a New Adaptation, Takes Immigrants’ Rights to the Opera
• Sonny Rollins Used to Practice the Sax on the Williamsburg Bridge
• Amazon Pet Day: All the best deals
• Staff Picks: Taipei Story, Robert Altman, Samantha Hunt, and More
• Making Theater: An Interview with Elizabeth LeCompte
• What Is Poetry For?
• Q&A with tendercare founder and CEO Shauna Sweeney
• What Is Poetry For?: Six More Public Cases

• Of Damages and Dog Whistles
• What So Proudly We Hailed
• The Unofficial Chief of Staff
• Dublin in My Tears
• What In God’s Name Happened To Ricky Gervais?
• Discover Weakly
• Labor History in Real Time
• We Were Supposed to Accomplish Something
• Dealbreaker
• Period Feminism

• Apple is reportedly still working on smart glasses of some kind
• Anyone Can Tell You Penn Station Is Awful—It Takes a Writer to Show It
• On Harriet Tubman, “Ugly Beauty,” and the Avant
• How to: Taking Pictures of PCBs
• TikTok wants me to host a dinner party. Is that an actual recession indicator?
• When Soviet Art Was Full of Hope
• Alice Neel and the Art of Self
• Women Hold Up Half the Sky: Feminist Posters 1974–1990
• U.N. confirms the ocean is screwed
• Poolside with Chuck Berry

• WhatsApp launches 'Advanced Chat Privacy' to protect sensitive conversations
• An Empty Saddle for Yevgeny Yevtushenko, Cowboy Poet
• What Does It Mean to Be Smart? Five Koans on Intelligence
• Anelise Chen: A Mollusk’s Guide to “Clamming Down”
• Today's Hurdle hints and answers for April 29, 2025
• What Is Poetry For?
• Remembering Joanne Kyger (1934
• On Translating Karolina Ramqvist’s Novel ‘The White City’
• Contingent No More
• Poolside with Chuck Berry