Republican senators could Taboo Sex: Daughter in law, Sister in law, Mother in law (2025)have asked the CEOs of Facebook, Twitter, and Google how reforming Section 230 would fundamentally change the internet.
Instead, less than a week before Election Day, lawmakers tried to bully them into letting Donald Trump spread misinformation.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey testified remotely on Wednesday in front of the Senate Commerce Committee.
There are a lot of hard questions that need be asked about Section 230, which protects tech companies from being liable for content posted by their users (unless they post something illegal).
Instead, here is what Republican senators talked about. Mississippi's Roger Wicker complained about "selective censorship" of conservatives. Several talked about so-called shadowbans. John Thune of South Dakota, in a bizarre attempt to disprove claims Republicans were working the refs by pressuring tech companies not to limit the reach of right-wing misinformation, asked each CEO, "Are you the ref?"
Ted Cruz screamed about the New York Post, at one point accusing Twitter of "working as a Democratic super PAC." Utah's Mike Lee repeatedly accused Twitter and Facebook of banning more posts from conservatives than progressives. (That might be because right-wing websites and politicians are spreading misinformation about — to cite a few recent examples — COVID-19 and mail-in voting, and their progressive counterparts are not.)
Tennessee's Marsha Blackburn (sitting in front of copies of her book, on sale now!) asked Dorsey repeatedly why he was censoring the president. Dorsey replied, "We have not censored the president."
It doesn't matter that Dorsey was telling the truth. The senators got their viral moments. They will spread on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube, ironically disproving the senators' claims that they are being censored on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.
Their goal has always been to put pressure on tech CEOs to let right-wing misinformation run rampant. And to make false equivalencies between the dangerous lies of Donald Trump and Breitbart, and the statements of Joe Biden and the reporting of respected newsrooms.
One party is trying to suppress the vote with lies about voter fraud. One party backs a president who is the single largest driver of coronavirus misinformation on the internet. The other party does neither. That's why only one party is being hit with warning labels and fact-checks. But the GOP is happy to claim otherwise, and watch their message spread freely online.
Topics Facebook Google X/Twitter
Mom and son's 'History of Dance' routine will get you moving20 practical gifts that people will actually useJim Nabors, TV's Gomer Pyle and recording star, dead at 87Adam Driver doesn't know what 'emo' means and no one can copeScheduling glitch gives all American Airline pilots holiday breakWhat the new Snapchat update gets right about social mediaResearchers may be selfSondors wants you to ditch your car for an all'Avengers: Infinity War' trailer features a 'Civil War' easter eggVerizon's 5G internet coming in 2018 could replace your home internetTwitter hero who deactivated Trump's account says it was a 'mistake'Amazon Mechanical Turk workers complete unexpected online tasksBurger King unleashes Flamin' Hot Mac n' CheetosWomen over 50 see sexual harassment very differently than millennialsCoinbase ordered to turn over some customer data'Avengers: Infinity War' trailer features a 'Civil War' easter eggMom and son's 'History of Dance' routine will get you movingThe supermoon doesn't deserve the hype it's gettingGame of Thrones' final season is going to be epic, but Drogo isn't backBurger King unleashes Flamin' Hot Mac n' Cheetos Kurt Vonnegut’s House Is Not Haunted by Sophie Kemp The Sofa by Cynthia Zarin What Lies Beyond the Red Earth? by Michael Salu Announcing Our Spring Issue by Emily Stokes Anatomy of a CPU Recommended Readings for Students by Yu Hua Caps for Sale by B.J. Novak A Dollhouse On Sven Holm’s Novella of Nuclear Disaster by Jeff VanderMeer Ananda Devi and Callie Siskel Recommend by The Paris Review Reading the Room: An Interview with Paul Yamazaki by Seminary Co The Secrets of Beauty by Jean Cocteau Lifesize Dioramas: At Carolee Schneemann's House by Hannah Gold Invisible Ink: At the CIA’s Creative Writing Group by Johannes Lichtman Against Remembrance: On Louise Glück by Elisa Gonzalez Syllabus: Unexpected Dramaturgy by Lynn Nottage Dare to Leave a Trace: On A City of Sadness by Michelle Kuo The Language of Lava Lamps by Nora Claire Miller Inheritance by Hebe Uhart Making of a Poem: Olivia Sokolowski on “Lover of Cars” by Olivia Sokolowski
2.427s , 8201 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Taboo Sex: Daughter in law, Sister in law, Mother in law (2025)】,Evergreen Information Network