It's a Friday,peter damien and flagellants eroticism people, which means there's more bad news from Facebook.
Facebook disclosed a data breach on Friday that affected 6.8 million users. The trouble once again came from the connectivity of third party apps. Facebook says it is "sorry this happened."
SEE ALSO: Facebook fined £500K for 'serious breaches' of data protection lawFrom September 13-25 of this year, developers had access to Facebook users' photos that they never had permission to see. Typically, apps should only be able to access photos in users' timelines. But while the bug was active, apps had access to photos in people's stories and photos they'd uploaded to Marketplace.
Perhaps most troubling, apps could also access photos that users may have uploaded to Facebook, but chose to never post. This means that Facebook actually stores photos that you uploaded and then thought, "hmm, better not," for an unspecified amount of time. Here's how Facebook explains it:
The bug also impacted photos that people uploaded to Facebook but chose not to post. For example, if someone uploads a photo to Facebook but doesn't finish posting it - maybe because they've lost reception or walked into a meeting - we store a copy of that photo so the person has it when they come back to the app to complete their post.
This photo breach may seem like small potatoes in comparison to the 50 million person attack in September in which hackers exploited a vulnerability to steal the personal information of 29 million people. Giving access to photos you never meant to share is troubling, but perhaps not as damning as getting your contact information and a host of other information pinched by potential identity thieves.
The timing is what's tricky here. Facebook disclosed the 50-million user data breach on September 25 — the same day it became aware of the photo bug. Under the GDPR, Facebook has 72 hours to notify users of data compromises. So why did Facebook wait nearly three months to tell us about this joyous invasion of our privacy?
Facebook plans to notify affected users with an "alert." That will send them to the Help Center where they can see which apps may have had access to their "other photos." There is no information about revoking access — once the unshared photo cat is out of the bag, it's apparently out.
Here's a mock up of the alert:
Mashable has reached out to Facebook to learn more about the timing of the incident, and whether there is any connection between the photo bug and the personal information breach. We're also asking about how long Facebook stores the photos you've chosen not to share, and whether there's a way to access and delete them. We'll update this story when and if we hear more.
Topics Cybersecurity Facebook Social Media
NYT's The Mini crossword answers for November 21iPhone 16: This new leak about the displays may disappoint youTuli Kupferberg’s Yeah!: The Tiny Magazine That Captured the 1960s by Alex Zafiris15+ Black Friday 2023 Chromebook deals at Best BuyIn the age of TikTok, the female gaze has lost all meaningAre Twitter's birthday balloons broken?OpenAI employees are pissed about Sam Altman departure. Here’s proof.On “Oh! Susanna” by Anthony MadridEureka Moment: Ernest Hemingway, Sam Lipsyte, James Wright by The Paris ReviewThe Life and Afterlife of Vivian Maier by Pamela BannosPuerto Rico Sketchbook: The Artists with the ShovelsGoogle redesigned the Chrome Web Store and it actually looks pretty goodTikTok's concert clip economy exposes fan culture's Y/N problemOpenAI employees are pissed about Sam Altman departure. Here’s proof.Black History by Asali SolomonBest deals of the day Jan. 30: 5thIn the age of TikTok, the female gaze has lost all meaningAn Alternate Recipe for ChestnutsDear Lynda: Diary Snoops and IllThe Dignified Bot Elon Musk passes Jeff Bezos as world's richest person Apple launches special, limited edition AirPods Pro for Chinese New Year Chelsea Clinton rips Alabama candidate who used racial slur LG's new OLED display goes from flat to curved for gaming What makes those 'Bridgerton' flashbacks so iconically Shonda Rhimes U2 cancels St. Louis show amid protests over Jason Stockley acquittal Very excited dog has a ball invading an Argentinian soccer game NEC says new facial recognition system isn't stopped by masks Samsung's larger 'Frame' TV can now switch into portrait mode Apple is reportedly working on two foldable iPhone models YouTube reportedly let Trump supporter profit as he tweeted from Capitol Uber is in trouble after yet another sexist promo Ken Jennings may have botched his chance at hosting 'Jeopardy!' Blue Ivy strutting around in Beyoncé's heels is seriously too cute for words TikTok's new confetti effect uses iPhone 12 Pro's LiDAR sensor Chrissy Teigen uses Twitter to get John Legend to pick up the phone J.K. Rowling has a fear of utterly gigantic spiders and honestly, who doesn't? Amazon delivers a killing blow to the pro Dancing emoji have completely transformed how we talk at work We pray that you enjoy, and are not instead disgusted by, this collection of cute fruit bats
3.5894s , 10194.1171875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【peter damien and flagellants eroticism】,Evergreen Information Network