Emma Thompson put a lot of careful thought into her decision to drop out of Skydance Animation's Luck,Watch In the Cut (2003) it seems.
The two-time Academy Award winner confirmed earlier in February that her decision to exit the 2021 movie stems from Skydance's controversial decision to hire John Lasseter in a leadership role. The disgraced former Pixar chief left Disney in 2018 under a cloud of sexual misconduct allegations.
SEE ALSO: Rashida Jones calls out Pixar's poor track record with female directorsJust days into 2019 -- Lasseter's exit from Disney was formalized at the end of 2018 -- Skydance Media announced its surprise hire. Lasseter would join the company in a repeat of his former Disney role, taking his place as the head of Skydance Animation.
The news wasn't well-received at all. Although the allegations surrounding Lasseter first surfaced in 2017, he spent most of the subsequent year on a (presumably forced) sabbatical. By the middle of 2018, he had shifted into a consulting role with Disney -- an arrangement that the company said would continue until Dec. 31, 2018.
Skydance's move to announce his hiring less than two weeks later was widely viewed as insensitive and tone deaf. The company acknowledged his history and told employees in an internal memo that it had investigated the allegations, but many on the outside rightly felt that the hiring sent an awful message to women.
Thompson's exit from Luckwas confirmed through a spokesperson on Feb. 19, little more than a month after Lasseter's hiring. She didn't say anything at the time, but she did let the studio know of her decision in a letter, and that letter has now been shared with the Los Angeles Times.
Thompson starts by expressing her appreciation for Luck director Alessandro Carloni. But in the same sentence, she also voices her confusion. No one in Hollywood can claim ignorance of the cultural shifts prompted by #MeToo and Time's Up at this point. So why would Skydance voluntarily empower someone with Lasseter's "pattern of misconduct," she wonders.
The bulk of Thompson's letter focuses on a series of pointed questions directed at Skydance. She'd like to know why the studio thinks Lasseter's contractual obligation to behave "professionally" would ease anyone's minds, given the history.
She also wonders what behaving professionally even means for someone like him; is the good behavior simply performative, and the product of an employment agreement? Is he just jumping through hoops so he can keep his job while he just thinks about the alleged stuff that got him in trouble instead of acting on it?
And really, in that context, what does a second chance even mean with someone like Lasseter? He's getting his second chance from Skydance, but that decision shifts the power over who does and doesn't work with him in the wrong direction.
If John Lasseter started his own company, then every employee would have been given the opportunity to choose whether or not to give him a second chance. But any Skydance employees who don't want to give him a second chance have to stay and be uncomfortable or lose their jobs. Shouldn’t it be John Lasseter who has to lose HIS job if the employees don’t want to give him a second chance?
Questions like these have been asked before, but Thompson's letter takes them out of the hypothetical and grounds them in a very real, and extremely unfortunate, situation. Reading the entire thing is well worth your time.
Topics Film
Best home security deal: Save $242.33 on a 4Microsoft Build 2025 dates are officially confirmedNYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for February 5: Tips to solve Connections #135Shop Casetify's Valentine's Day Sale and get 20% your purchase of two or more items6 Super Bowl halftime shows that were better than the gameBill threatens to make using DeepSeek a crime for AmericansBest gifting deal: The Skylight digital frame is 25% off at AmazonBest Chromebook deal: Get $100 off a Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i ChromebookReal Estelí vs. Tigres UANL 2025 livestream: Watch Concacaf Champions Cup for freeChicago Bulls vs. Minnesota Timberwolves 2025 livestream: Watch NBA onlineBest robot vacuum deal: Save $400 on the roborock Q5 Pro+6 Super Bowl halftime shows that were better than the gameBest home security deal: Save $242.33 on a 4Best charger deal: Get the Anker Zolo Portable Charger for just $16 at Amazon6 Super Bowl halftime shows that were better than the gameSpacecraft finds a positively enormous planet 12 times Jupiter's massSpotify Premium Individual: Get two months freePachuca vs. León 2025 livestream: Watch Liga MX for freeLefant M210 robot vacuum deal: Get it for $89 at AmazonGoogle scraps diverse hiring targets following Trump's crusade against DEI Elie Wiesel, 1928–2016 Habitat for Humility: Voluntourism in Lesotho How Old Issues of Wired Show Changes in the Tech Industry Staff Picks: Eliot Weinberger, Max Porter, Andrzej Zulawski The Radical Politics in Cloud “Catch the Heavenly Bodies”: 4 Paintings by Jay Miriam Staring Deep into Robert Ryman’s White Squares Dear Bill Cunningham Road Trip: Paintings by Greg Drasler What Does an Italo Calvino Look Like as a Building? Luc Sante on the Appeal of Junk Shops What If Algorithms Made Cities? Daniel Brown’s Dystopian Photos Becoming a Redwood #ReadEverywhere, Even in the Ring Poem: Martha Hollander, “Three Geographers” Early Photography from the Victorian Era Fidel Speaks: Literature in Castro’s Cuba Daniel Spoerri’s Flea Ken Price’s Candy Glen Baxter Week, Day Five: Porn Collections, Yodelers
2.8392s , 10132.5859375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Watch In the Cut (2003)】,Evergreen Information Network